Richards v Quinten

The court found that a cyclist riding in a cycle lane had sufficient opportunity to take evasive action to avoid a collision with a car which was emerging from a driveway.

Although it was found that the car driver should have proceeded with extreme caution as his view was extremely restricted, it was deemed that the cyclist should have seen the emerging vehicle.

Richards v Quinten

The cyclist was held 75% to blame as the court ruled that he held the greater opportunity to that of the car driver to avoid the incident as he should have been able to see the vehicle emerging from the driveway.

 
 

We cover the whole of Scotland and have solicitors based in the Borders, Central Belt and Aberdeen

Central Scotland
4 Redheughs Rigg Westpoint,
South Gyle,
Edinburgh,
EH12 9DQ

South of Scotland
5 Cherry Court,
Cavalry Park,
Peebles,
EH45 9BU

 
 

Happy Clients
Testimonials
Videos
Blog

Correspondance Address
RTA LAW LLP
16-20 Castle Street,
Edinburgh,
EH2 3AT

 

Cycle Law Scotland logo

© 2022 Cycle Law Scotland